Editorial
Hypnosis: a new anesthetic technique!
M.M. LUCAS-POLOMENI
MD
Service d’Anesthe´sie-Re´animation Chirurgicale 2, Hoˆpital Pontchaillou, Universite´ Rennes 1,
Rennes, France
In parallel with its rapid development in psychotherapy,
hypnosis also finds applications in anesthesia
and surgery. The founding father of modern
hypnosis is Milton Erickson, who was born in 1901
and founded the American Society for Clinical
Hypnosis. He defined hypnosis as a natural phenomenon
that anyone of us can reach. It is an altered
state of consciousness based on the principle of
dissociation, with a concentrated but focused attention
which is different from the state of sleep (1). In
fact, hypnosis corresponds to a state of inner
absorption and such a focused attention that the
individual becomes unconcerned about any other
consideration (2). The analgesic effect of hypnosis in
pain management has been extensively studied (3).
It is used both for acute and chronic pain management
in adults (4–6). Indeed at Liege University, in
Belgium, Faymonville’s team has been using hypnosedation
that is, use of hypnosis as an adjunct to
conscious sedation for surgery performed under
local anesthesia since 1992 (7). Hypnosis and hypnosedation
techniques can easily be adapted to
children who have a natural power of playing, and
for whom an imaginary world is close and accessible.
Anesthetists can have no problem inducing a
formal trance in children. Recall of pleasant life
experiences has served as the hypnotic substratum.
Preoperative anxiety most often reveals a fear of
separation from the parents and familiar environment,
the loss of control and also the confrontation
with an unknown place and people; this anxiety has
significant consequences, especially as it may contribute
to the occurrence of postoperative behavioral
disorders (8). The most common technique to reduce
preoperative anxiety is sedative premedication with
midazolam (9). In our department, hypnosis is used
as premedication instead of rectally administered
midazolam. This practice has reduced preoperative
anxiety and also the incidence of postoperative
behavioral disorders (personal data).
We have also used hypnosedation with success
(hypnosis in combination with conscious intravenous
sedation mainly using low dose remifentanil)
and local anesthesia, for example ilio-inguinal/iliohypogastric
block for hernia repair. This has proved
to be a valuable alternative to traditional anesthesia
techniques with halogenated agents, as previously
reported in adults (10). The child is asked to choose a
pleasant life experience to think about during surgery;
the initiation of the relaxation technique itself
is simple and usually provides the child with a sense
of control. The technique primarily uses indirect
suggestions for developing and deepening a hypnotic
state; the exact content of the specific suggestions
used during the course of induction depends
on the patient’s behavior and on our judgment of
what would most readily elicit a response from the
patient. When the child is thought to be at an
adequate trance level, i.e. occurrence of muscle
relaxation, decrease in heart rate and respiratory
rate, local anesthesia is performed. Sometimes small
amounts of remifentanil are given throughout the
surgical procedure to facilitate conduct of surgery.
At the end of the procedure, the anesthetist can
wake up the child from the trance by changing the
behavior and quality of the tone of voice.
Our hypnotic technique uses indirect suggestion
and distraction to reduce the sensory and affective
dimension of the pain experience (11). Suggestion of
pleasant experiences seems more effective in producing
pain relief than suggestion of declining pain
(12). The resulting hypnotic trance almost always
involves essential dissociation. This unconscious
dissociative mechanism results in decreased pain.
Correspondence to:
d’Anesthe´sie-Re´animation Chirurgicale 2, Hoˆ pital Pontchaillou,
35033-Rennes cedex 9, France (email: marie-madeleine.lucas@
chu-rennes.fr).
Dr Marie-Madeleine Lucas-Polomeni, Service
Pediatric Anesthesia 2004
14: 975–976
Indeed, providing well-being and a relaxed state,
enables the children to actively participate in the
anesthesia and is likely to leave them with a pleasant
memory. This anesthetic technique is based on close
collaboration between the patient, the anesthetist
and the surgeon. Normal working conditions change
dramatically: the operation theatre is calm, the child
is conscious but distracted during surgery, although
surgical manipulation must be gentle and precise.
The anesthetist closely follows the operation to
anticipate the patient needs.
There is no question that the phenomenon of
hypnotic analgesia is real. In order to better understand
what happens during the hypnotic state
during surgery, the brain mechanisms underlying
the hypnotic state have been studied in healthy
volunteers by determining the distribution of regional
cerebral blood flow, taken as an index of local
neuronal activity. Hypnosis is related to the activation
of a widespread, mainly left-sided, set of cortical
areas involving occipital, parietal, precentral, premotor
and ventrolateral prefrontal cortices and a few
right sided regions (occipital and anterior cingulated
cortices). The pattern of activation during the hypnotic
state differs from that induced in normal
subjects by simple evocation of autobiographical
memories. These results suggest that, hypnosis is a
particular cerebral waking state where the subject,
although seemingly somnolent, experiences vivid
multimodal, coherent, memory-based mental imagery
that invades and fills the consciousness (13,14).
Practicing hypnosis does require some contribution
especially in terms of training and competence.
It especially calls for information because hypnosis
is first and foremost a state of mind; the will to
communicate differently and depends on the quality
of the relationship between the child and the person
performing the hypnosis. There are few contraindications,
the main restrictions being deafness and
states of mental retardation. Nonetheless, hypnosis
is a very effective technique for providing relief of
anxiety and pain in surgery under local anesthesia.
2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 975
References
1 Erickson MH, Rossi EL, Rossi SI.
Induction of Clinical Hypnosis and Forms of Indirect Suggestion
Irvington Publishers Inc., New York, 1976.
2 Price D. Hypnotic analgesia: psychological and neural mechanisms.
Hypnotic Realities: The.
Science
3 Montgomery GH, DuHamel KN, Redd WH. A meta-analysis of
hypnotically induced analgesia: how effective is hypnosis?
Clin Exp Hypn
4 Iserson KV. Hypnosis for pediatric fracture reduction.
Med
5 Anbar RD. Self-hypnosis for management of chronic dyspnea
in pediatric patients.
6 Zeltzer LK, Dolgin MJ, LeBaron S
controlled study of behavioral intervention for chemotherapy
distress in children with cancer.
7 Faymonville ME, Fissette J, Mambourg PH
adjunct thereapy in conscious sedation for plastic surgery.
Anesth
8 Kotiniemi LH, Ryhanen PT. Behavioural changes and
children’s memories after intravenous, inhalation and
rectal induction of anaesthesia.
9 Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Wang SM
outcomes in children: effects of sedative premedication.
2000; 288: 1769–1772.Int J2000; 48: 138–153.J Emerg1999; 17: 53–56.Pediatrics 2001; 107: E21.et al. A randomized,Pediatrics 1991; 88: 34–42.et al. Hypnosis asReg1995; 20: 145–151.Pediatr Anesth 1996; 6: 201–207.et al. Postoperative behavioralAnesthesiology
1999;
10 Schulz-Stubner S. Clinical hypnosis instead of drug-based
sedation for procedures under regional anesthesia.
Pain Med
11 Erickson MH. The interpersonal hypnotic technique for symptom
correction and pain control.
209.
12 Hilgard ER. The problem of divided consciousness; a neodissociation
interpretation.
13 Marquet P, Faymonville ME, Degueldre C
neuroanatomy of hypnotic state.
333.
14 Faymonville ME, Laureys S, Degueldre C
mechanisms of antinociceptive effects of hypnosis.
90: 758–765.Reg Anesth2002; 27: 622–623.Am J Clin Hypn 1966; 8: 198–Ann N Y Acad Sci 1977; 296: 48–59.et al. FunctionalBiol Psychiatry 1999; 45: 327–et al. NeuralAnesthesiology
2000;
92: 1257–1267.
976 M.M. LUCAS-POLOMENI
2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Pediatric Anesthesia, 14, 975–976